Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
Final votes · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Anna BRYŁKA
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Anna BRYŁKA only. Show every member
Anna BRYŁKA’s votes against the line, 16
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure | Abstained | Against | Patriots |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Final vote Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034 | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system | Against | Abstained | Patriots |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Application EGF/2026/000 TA 2026 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission | Against | Abstained | Patriots |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/Soliver | Against | For | Patriots |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 21 May 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole The need to reduce work-related fatalities | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 20 May 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Canada Agreement laying down the conditions for the participation of Canadian legal entities and products originating in Canada to procurement under the SAFE Instrument | For | Against | Patriots |
| 20 May 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision United Nations Convention against Cybercrime | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 19 May 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/008 BE/Liberty - Belgium | Against | For | Patriots |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 | Abstained | For | Patriots |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability | Against | For | Patriots |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 100 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna BRYŁKA changed group , Patriots · Poland | 13.4 % | 119 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 14 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 185 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 100 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Anna BRYŁKA”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257064&scope=final&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Anna BRYŁKA}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257064&scope=final&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257064&scope=final&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}