Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mirosława NYKIEL
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Mirosława NYKIEL only. Show every member
Mirosława NYKIEL’s votes against the line, 52
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Final vote Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 35 to Article 3, paragraph 4 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund | Against | For | EPP |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishment of the digital euro | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 66 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 20 to paragraph 33 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | EPP |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 9 to paragraph 21 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote Temporary support and payment of advances regarding the increased fertiliser prices due to the Middle East crisis | Against | For | EPP |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after recital 2 Temporary support and payment of advances regarding the increased fertiliser prices due to the Middle East crisis | For | Against | EPP |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Coordination of social security systems | Against | For | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Separate vote on recital A Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland | Against | For | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 Recruitment of children by organised crime | For | Against | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 2 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich | For | Against | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after Recital J 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Paragraph 7 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 8 to paragraph 7 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on Albania | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on Albania | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 8 to recital AJ Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 6 to recital Q Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Recital G — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | Against | For | EPP |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Recital S — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 64 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Paragraph 37 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Paragraph 36 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Paragraph 36 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Against | For | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 2 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 36 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | Against | Abstained | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 36 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 27 to paragraph 6 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | For | Against | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 95 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | For | Against | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 92 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | For | Against | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 91 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | For | Against | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 90 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | For | Against | EPP |
Show all 52 votes
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Mar 2026 | Final vote Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | For | Against | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 29 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Abstained | For | EPP |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirosława NYKIEL , EPP · Poland | 4.7 % | 1 113 | 44 | 7 | 1 | 43 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257049&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mirosława NYKIEL”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257049&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mirosława NYKIEL}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257049&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257049&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}