Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Sigrid FRIIS

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Showing Sigrid FRIIS only. Show every member

Sigrid FRIIS’s votes against the line, 84

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAbstainedForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital G Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAbstainedForRenew
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAbstainedForRenew
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAbstainedForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 1 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstRenew
15 Sept 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAbstainedAgainstRenew
15 Sept 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAbstainedAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAbstainedAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 25 to recital 32 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 24, adding text after recital 13 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 23, adding text after recital 8 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 22, adding text after recital 5 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 28, adding text after Article 3 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 20 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point j Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 19 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point vii Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 18 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point iii Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 16 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point b Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 27 to Article 3, paragraph 1, after point a Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 15 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 14 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 13 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 12 to Article 2, after point 4 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 10 to Article 2, after point 4 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 8 to Article 1, paragraph 1 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstRenew
8 Jul 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 108 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstRenew
8 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstRenew
7 Jul 2026Final vote Temporary support and payment of advances regarding the increased fertiliser prices due to the Middle East crisisAbstainedForRenew
17 Jun 2026Amendment 3 to recital T Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAbstainedAgainstRenew
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after Recital J Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceForAgainstRenew
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point k Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceForAgainstRenew
16 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedForAgainstRenew
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Amendments 3 + 5 (voted as one) to paragraph 1 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAbstainedAgainstRenew
21 May 2026Recital S — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedForRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 28 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapForAgainstRenew
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedForRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 2 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardForAgainstRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardForAgainstRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 36 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardForAgainstRenew
Show all 84 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
21 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 36 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAbstainedAgainstRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 7 Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for CourtsForAgainstRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for CourtsForAgainstRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 12 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAbstainedAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 41, adding text after recital P Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendments 25 + 38 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point af Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 57 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 56 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 55 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAbstainedForRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 42 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsForAgainstRenew
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel’s air strikes in Lebanon Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel’s air strikes in LebanonForAgainstRenew
30 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 16 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentAbstainedForRenew
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?AgainstForRenew
30 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 37 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?ForAgainstRenew
30 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 15 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?ForAgainstRenew
30 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 32 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAbstainedAgainstRenew
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentForAgainstRenew
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 15 — part 1 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstForRenew
29 Apr 2026Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 71 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstRenew
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 71 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceAgainstForRenew
29 Apr 2026Amendment 28 to paragraph 247, after point iv Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionForAgainstRenew
29 Apr 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 15 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionForAgainstRenew
28 Apr 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 37 Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
28 Apr 2026Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 48 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAgainstRenew
28 Apr 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAgainstRenew
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 89 — part 1 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AgainstForRenew
28 Apr 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 71 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstRenew
28 Apr 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 47 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstRenew
28 Apr 2026Amendment 28 to paragraph 47 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstRenew
28 Apr 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstRenew
26 Mar 2026Amendment 33 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationForAgainstRenew

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Sigrid FRIIS , Renew · Denmark 5.0 %1 672651900

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Sigrid FRIIS”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257038&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Sigrid FRIIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257038&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257038&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}