Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Stephen Nikola BARTULICA

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

25 Mar 2026 – today

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 755

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Stephen Nikola BARTULICA only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Stephen Nikola BARTULICA’s votes against the line, 33

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
17 Sept 2026	Recital AD — part 1 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people	Against	For	ECR
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 24 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Against	Abstained	ECR
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 16 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Against	Abstained	ECR
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 8 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Against	Abstained	ECR
15 Sept 2026	Final vote — text as a whole The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027	Against	Abstained	ECR
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre	Against	For	ECR
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan	Abstained	For	ECR
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive	For	Abstained	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 2025 Commission report on Serbia	Against	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 52 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	For	Abstained	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 3 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	For	Against	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia	For	Abstained	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on Albania	Abstained	For	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Montenegro	Against	For	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 27 2025 Commission report on Montenegro	Abstained	Against	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 43 2025 Commission report on Türkiye	Abstained	Against	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 42 2025 Commission report on Türkiye	Abstained	For	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 35 2025 Commission report on Türkiye	Abstained	Against	ECR
16 Jun 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values	Against	Abstained	ECR
16 Jun 2026	Final vote — text as a whole European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded	Against	Abstained	ECR
21 May 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 43 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap	Abstained	Against	ECR
21 May 2026	Amendment 3 to paragraph 7 Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts	Abstained	For	ECR
20 May 2026	Paragraph 1, point n — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	For	Against	ECR
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 138 — part 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament	Abstained	Against	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Recital AP — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Abstained	Against	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	For	Against	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 2, adding text after Recital P Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	Abstained	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after Recital O Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	Abstained	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 54 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Abstained	Against	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 88, adding text after paragraph 21 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 87, adding text after paragraph 21 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	Abstained	ECR

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA , ECR · Croatia	2.3 %	1 412	9	12	12	0

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257000&scope=all&to=2026-09-26
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Stephen Nikola BARTULICA”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257000&scope=all&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Stephen Nikola BARTULICA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257000&scope=all&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257000&scope=all&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}