Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mary KHAN
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Mary KHAN only. Show every member
Mary KHAN’s votes against the line, 30
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 | Against | Abstained | ESN |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures | Against | For | ESN |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Separate vote on recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 2 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after recital V 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | ESN |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 2 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | ESN |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 27 to paragraph 40 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) | Against | Abstained | ESN |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Romania, Cyprus and Spain with regard to natural disasters in 2025 | Against | For | ESN |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Separate vote on recital E Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Recital B — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 43 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | For | Abstained | ESN |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 8 to paragraph 12 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran | Against | Abstained | ESN |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 19 — part 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Supporting democratic resilience in Armenia | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine | For | Against | ESN |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Financial literacy and the rise of finfluencers in the context of the savings and investments union | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 10 to paragraph 16 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament | Abstained | For | ESN |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 21 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Against | Abstained | ESN |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 9 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | ESN |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision International Cocoa Agreement | For | Abstained | ESN |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Discharge 2024: Joint Undertakings | For | Against | ESN |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 23 to paragraph 74 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | For | Against | ESN |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 32 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 | Against | For | ESN |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 34 to paragraph 71 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | Against | ESN |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 26 to paragraph 46 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | For | ESN |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 40 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | For | ESN |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | For | ESN |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 39 — part 1 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | For | ESN |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/005 AT/KTM - Austria | For | Against | ESN |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary KHAN , ESN · Germany | 2.1 % | 1 429 | 10 | 14 | 6 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256957&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mary KHAN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256957&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Mary KHAN}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256957&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256957&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}