Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Gabriella GERZSENYI

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Gabriella GERZSENYI only. Show every member

Gabriella GERZSENYI’s votes against the line, 48

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
30 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 46 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?ForAgainstEPP
30 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 27 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?ForAgainstEPP
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 18 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?ForAgainstEPP
30 Apr 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 11 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?ForAgainstEPP
30 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 27 — part 2 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentForAgainstEPP
30 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 27 — part 1 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital D Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 113 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital BM Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Recital BC — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Recital BC — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 64 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 51 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 45 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 12 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 20, adding text after Article 1 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one), adding text after recital 22 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 98, adding text after recital 2 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 117 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 116 to Article 2, before paragraph 1 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: AgenciesAbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 27 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceForAbstainedEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 1 to recital C Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionAbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 30 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 53 to paragraph 173 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 49 to paragraph 20, point x Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 3 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024AgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 16 to paragraph 3 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024AgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024AgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AL — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 12 — part 3 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 12 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024AbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Final vote Amendments to Biocidal Products Regulation as regards the extension of certain data protection periodsAbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 57 to paragraph 16 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 10 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAbstainedAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAbstainedAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 51 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstEPP

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Gabriella GERZSENYI , EPP · Hungary 9.8 %4892027147

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256866&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Gabriella GERZSENYI”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256866&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Gabriella GERZSENYI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256866&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256866&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}