Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Matjaž NEMEC
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Matjaž NEMEC only. Show every member
Matjaž NEMEC’s votes against the line, 34
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 11, adding text after citation 70 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | S&D |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 44 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | S&D |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | For | Against | S&D |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | For | Against | S&D |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 108 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 21 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 3 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 19 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 | For | Against | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 — part 2 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025 | For | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital D Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso | For | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso | For | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso | For | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 73 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 27, adding text after Recital 15 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 37 to Annex II, after point 2 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 17 + 25 (voted as one) Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | Against | For | S&D |
| 20 May 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 59 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | S&D |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 56 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | S&D |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 52 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 42 to paragraph 1, after point d Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 11 — part 2 Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine | For | Against | S&D |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 28 — part 2 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament | For | Against | S&D |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 46 — part 2 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | Against | For | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 105 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Against | For | S&D |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matjaž NEMEC , S&D · Slovenia | 2.5 % | 1 374 | 23 | 8 | 3 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=233862&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Matjaž NEMEC”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=233862&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Matjaž NEMEC}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=233862&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=233862&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}