Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES only. Show every member
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES’s votes against the line, 28
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | For | Against | S&D |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 24 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | S&D |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 2 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure | Against | For | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 19 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point d Recommendation on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the region | Against | For | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 2, point c Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilities | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Vote on text inserted after recital C Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich | Against | Abstained | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 1 to recital 34 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 1 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 15 + 16 + 24 + 36 (voted as one), adding text after Article 37 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | Against | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 9 to Article 27, paragraph 1, point c Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 8 to Article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, after point d Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | Against | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 6 to Article 6, paragraph 3, after point d Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | Against | For | S&D |
| 15 Jun 2026 | Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East | For | Against | S&D |
| 18 May 2026 | Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena | Against | For | S&D |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act | For | Against | S&D |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 54 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Against | For | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 50 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 48 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 43 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 38 to paragraph 100 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 34 to paragraph 71 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 28 to paragraph 47 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | S&D |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 32, adding text after recital 4 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Against | Abstained | S&D |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 36, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Against | For | S&D |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 34, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Against | For | S&D |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 30, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Against | For | S&D |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES , S&D · Spain | 1.9 % | 1 461 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 13 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197718&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197718&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197718&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197718&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}