Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 755

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN’s votes against the line, 25

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
16 Sept 2026	Recital AC — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Abstained	For	EPP
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 48 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	For	Against	EPP
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 48 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Abstained	For	EPP
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 46 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Abstained	For	EPP
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 45 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Abstained	For	EPP
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 16 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Abstained	For	EPP
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 8 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Against	For	EPP
16 Sept 2026	Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Against	Abstained	EPP
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee	Against	For	EPP
15 Sept 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 108 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Against	For	EPP
15 Sept 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 10 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure	Against	For	EPP
15 Sept 2026	Final vote Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances	Against	For	EPP
9 Jul 2026	Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishment of the digital euro	Abstained	For	EPP
8 Jul 2026	Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 3 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality	Abstained	For	EPP
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 33 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	Against	EPP
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 3 to paragraph 27 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector	For	Against	EPP
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 3, adding text after recital Y Recommendation on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the region	Abstained	Against	EPP
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 7 to paragraph 2, point p Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilities	For	Against	EPP
17 Jun 2026	Final vote General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products	Against	For	EPP
21 May 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 81 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap	Abstained	For	EPP
21 May 2026	Paragraph 36 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap	Against	For	EPP
29 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 117 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report	For	Against	EPP
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 46 — part 2 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission	Abstained	For	EPP
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	EPP
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 32, adding text after recital 4 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	For	Against	EPP

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN , EPP · Romania	1.9 %	1 349	13	11	1	1

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197636&to=2026-09-25
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197636&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197636&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197636&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}