Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Rasmus ANDRESEN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Rasmus ANDRESEN only. Show every member

Rasmus ANDRESEN’s votes against the line, 39

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAbstainedAgainstGreens
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstGreens
16 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstGreens
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crimeForAgainstGreens
16 Sept 2026Proposal to reject the text Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)ForAgainstGreens
15 Sept 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 87 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeForAgainstGreens
15 Sept 2026Recital J — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstForGreens
15 Sept 2026Amendment 128 to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAbstainedAgainstGreens
7 Jul 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Competition policy – annual report 2025ForAgainstGreens
7 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2025AgainstAbstainedGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAgainstAbstainedGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 3 to recital T Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAbstainedForGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point k Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAbstainedForGreens
17 Jun 2026Paragraph 71 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaForAbstainedGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 2 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAgainstAbstainedGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 57 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAbstainedGreens
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 21 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAbstainedForGreens
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstainedGreens
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital M Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstGreens
20 May 2026Amendments 23 + 37 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstGreens
20 May 2026Amendment 55 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstForGreens
20 May 2026Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForGreens
30 Apr 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Financial literacy and the rise of finfluencers in the context of the savings and investments unionAgainstForGreens
30 Apr 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identitiesForAgainstGreens
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 87 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstGreens
29 Apr 2026Amendment 44 to paragraph 24 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAgainstAbstainedGreens
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Data Protection SupervisorAgainstForGreens
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 47 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionForAgainstGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 89 — part 1 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AgainstForGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 28 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedForGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 87, adding text after paragraph 21 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 5 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedAgainstGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Extension of the term of office of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Final vote Extension of the term of office of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedForGreens
26 Mar 2026Final vote Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAbstainedAgainstGreens

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Rasmus ANDRESEN , Greens · Germany 2.5 %1 5621710126

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197448&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Rasmus ANDRESEN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197448&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Rasmus ANDRESEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197448&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197448&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}