Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pär HOLMGREN
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Pär HOLMGREN only. Show every member
Pär HOLMGREN’s votes against the line, 38
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure | For | Against | Greens |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Proposal to reject the text Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Proposal to reject the text Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote Temporary support and payment of advances regarding the increased fertiliser prices due to the Middle East crisis | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 43 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 42 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 1; Directive (EU) 2020/262 General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 89 to recital 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Proposal to vote on amendments Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America | For | Against | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 16 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment | For | Against | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 32 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 3 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after recital G Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 46 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 26 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 28 to paragraph 247, after point iv Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | For | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote Amendments to Biocidal Products Regulation as regards the extension of certain data protection periods | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after Recital P Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after Recital O Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 120 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 47 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 39 — part 1 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 21 to paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Abstained | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Global Gateway – past impacts and future orientation | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Final vote Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | For | Against | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 29 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 31 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | For | Against | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 33 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | For | Against | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 34, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Against | For | Greens |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 30, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Against | For | Greens |
| 25 Mar 2026 | Thursday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Request for withdrawal from voting time Final vote Thursday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group – Request for withdrawal from voting time | Abstained | For | Greens |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pär HOLMGREN , Greens · Sweden | 2.2 % | 1 722 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 37 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197398&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pär HOLMGREN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197398&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pär HOLMGREN}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197398&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197398&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}