Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Elsi KATAINEN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 755

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Elsi KATAINEN only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Elsi KATAINEN’s votes against the line, 32

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
16 Sept 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 60 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Against	For	Renew
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee	For	Against	Renew
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 35 to Article 3, paragraph 4 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund	Against	For	Renew
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 39 — part 2 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund	Against	For	Renew
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures	Against	For	Renew
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive	Abstained	For	Renew
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after recital N Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland	For	Against	Renew
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 7 to paragraph 6 Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines	For	Against	Renew
17 Jun 2026	Proposal to vote on amendments Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)	Against	For	Renew
16 Jun 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 21 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded	Against	For	Renew
16 Jun 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded	Against	For	Renew
21 May 2026	Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalities	Against	For	Renew
21 May 2026	Separate vote on recital AH Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap	Abstained	For	Renew
21 May 2026	Paragraph 56 — part 1 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Against	For	Renew
21 May 2026	Amendment 43 to paragraph 56 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	For	Against	Renew
30 Apr 2026	Recital I — part 2 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment	Against	For	Renew
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 20 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Data Protection Supervisor	For	Against	Renew
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 1 to recital C Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union	For	Against	Renew
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 3 to paragraph 41 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union	For	Against	Renew
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union	Abstained	Against	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Final vote on the provisional agreement European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: workers affected by imminent job displacement	Against	For	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 5 to paragraph 40 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	For	Against	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 4 to paragraph 40 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	For	Against	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after Recital O Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 126 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 125 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 124 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 123 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 120 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 116 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	Renew
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	Renew

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Elsi KATAINEN , Renew · Finland	1.9 %	1 697	29	3	0	21

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=191693&to=2026-09-25
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Elsi KATAINEN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=191693&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Elsi KATAINEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=191693&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=191693&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}