Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jonás FERNÁNDEZ

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 755

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Jonás FERNÁNDEZ only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Jonás FERNÁNDEZ’s votes against the line, 24

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
16 Sept 2026	Final vote on the provisional agreement Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V)	Against	For	S&D
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027	For	Abstained	S&D
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 24 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Abstained	Against	S&D
8 Jul 2026	Separate vote on recital F EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Against	For	S&D
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 3 to recital D Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilities	Abstained	Against	S&D
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 4 to paragraph 2, point c Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilities	Abstained	Against	S&D
18 Jun 2026	Vote on text inserted after recital C Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich	For	Abstained	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 1 to recital 34 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	Against	For	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendments 15 + 16 + 24 + 36 (voted as one), adding text after Article 37 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	Against	For	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 9 to Article 27, paragraph 1, point c Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	Against	For	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 8 to Article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, after point d Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	Against	For	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 6 to Article 6, paragraph 3, after point d Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	Against	For	S&D
16 Jun 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 21 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded	Against	For	S&D
21 May 2026	Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) to recital F The need to reduce work-related fatalities	Abstained	Against	S&D
20 May 2026	Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point r Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	For	Against	S&D
30 Apr 2026	Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 27 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?	Against	For	S&D
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 56 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Against	For	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 50 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 48 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 43 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	For	Against	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 32, adding text after recital 4 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	Against	Abstained	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 36, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	Against	For	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 34, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	Against	For	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 30, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	Against	For	S&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ , S&D · Spain	1.5 %	1 580	17	4	3	15

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=125046&to=2026-09-25
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jonás FERNÁNDEZ”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=125046&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jonás FERNÁNDEZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=125046&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=125046&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}