Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Anna STÜRGKH

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Anna STÜRGKH only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Anna STÜRGKH’s votes against the line, 18

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027	Abstained	Against	Renew
15 Sept 2026	Final vote Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances	Against	For	Renew
12 Mar 2026	Amendment 26 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024	Against	For	Renew
12 Mar 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 2 Case of Elene Khoshtaria and political prisoners under the Georgian Dream regime	Abstained	For	Renew
11 Mar 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 53 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors	Abstained	For	Renew
11 Mar 2026	Final vote Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	Against	For	Renew
11 Mar 2026	Amendment 2, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 2 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	Against	For	Renew
11 Mar 2026	Amendment 2, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	Against	For	Renew
11 Mar 2026	Proposal to reject the text Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application	For	Against	Renew
12 Feb 2026	Separate vote on recital O Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights	Against	For	Renew
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 8 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights	Abstained	For	Renew
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 22 — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Against	For	Renew
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 22 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Against	For	Renew
22 Jan 2026	Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Brutal repression against protesters in Iran	For	Against	Renew
21 Jan 2026	Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025	Abstained	Against	Renew
21 Jan 2026	Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 27 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025	For	Against	Renew
21 Jan 2026	Amendment 5 to paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, after point b Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025	Abstained	Against	Renew
20 Jan 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies	Against	For	Renew

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Anna STÜRGKH , Renew · Austria	1.7 %	1 073	12	6	0	15

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

2 521 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
81 of 342 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=256839&to=2026-12-31
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Anna STÜRGKH”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=256839&to=2026-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Anna STÜRGKH}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=256839&to=2026-12-31}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=256839&to=2026-12-31},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}