Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Vladimir PREBILIČ

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes261All roll calls2 521
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Vladimir PREBILIČ only. Show every member

Vladimir PREBILIČ’s votes against the line, 38

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityForAgainstGreens
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanForAgainstGreens
8 Jul 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 3 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedAgainstGreens
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 12 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025AbstainedAgainstGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandForAbstainedGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedAgainstGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandForAgainstGreens
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 3 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForGreens
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoForAbstainedGreens
18 Jun 2026Vote on text inserted after recital C Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichForAbstainedGreens
16 Jun 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAgainstGreens
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identitiesAbstainedForGreens
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital BE Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstGreens
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital G Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstGreens
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 46 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 120 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 47 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 21 to paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
28 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAbstainedGreens
26 Mar 2026Amendment 53, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAbstainedGreens
10 Feb 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAbstainedForGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 83 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025ForAbstainedGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 83 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025ForAbstainedGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 57 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025ForAbstainedGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 29 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025ForAbstainedGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 22 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025ForAbstainedGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 22 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025ForAbstainedGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 22 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025ForAbstainedGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 27 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025AgainstForGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 14 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025AbstainedAgainstGreens
21 Jan 2026Separate vote on recital AJ Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025ForAgainstGreens
21 Jan 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 34 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025ForAbstainedGreens
20 Jan 2026Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstAbstainedGreens
20 Jan 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesForAbstainedGreens
20 Jan 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesForAbstainedGreens

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Vladimir PREBILIČ , Greens · Slovenia 2.0 %1 943107210

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 2 521 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 81 of 342 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=256813&to=2026-12-31
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Vladimir PREBILIČ”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=256813&to=2026-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Vladimir PREBILIČ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=256813&to=2026-12-31}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=256813&to=2026-12-31},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}