Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Thijs REUTEN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes261All roll calls2 521
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Thijs REUTEN only. Show every member

Thijs REUTEN’s votes against the line, 102

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 12 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital G Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityAgainstForS&D
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crimeAbstainedForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedForS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial systemAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to recital S Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after Recital J Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 57 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 35 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 22 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 12 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 27, adding text after Recital 15 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 1 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 37 to Annex II, after point 2 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendments 21 + 31 (voted as one), adding text after Article 4 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedAgainstS&D
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForS&D
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsAgainstForS&D
20 May 2026Amendment 28 to paragraph 1, point ap Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstForS&D
20 May 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstS&D
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAbstainedForS&D
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision United Nations Convention against CybercrimeAbstainedForS&D
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementAbstainedForS&D
30 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 16 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentAgainstForS&D
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?AgainstForS&D
29 Apr 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Iceland agreement on transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data to prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious crimeAbstainedForS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 91, adding text after recital 15 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAgainstS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 105 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAbstainedS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 96 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAbstainedS&D
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 46 — part 2 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAgainstForS&D
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureAbstainedForS&D
Show all 102 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
28 Apr 2026Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 50 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Final vote Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedForS&D
26 Mar 2026Final vote Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAgainstForS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 32, adding text after recital 4 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAgainstAbstainedS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 31 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAgainstForS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 33 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAgainstAbstainedS&D
11 Mar 2026Amendment 18, adding text after recital 4 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationForAgainstS&D
11 Mar 2026Amendment 3 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAgainstForS&D
11 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 2 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAgainstForS&D
11 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationForAbstainedS&D
11 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedForS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 62 to recital O Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 87 to paragraph 52 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 48 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 48 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 84 to paragraph 43 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 82 to paragraph 40 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 81 to paragraph 39 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 28 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 28 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 28 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAgainstForS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 27 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 27 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 26 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 25 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 14 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 13 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 13 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAgainstForS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 3 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 3 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
10 Mar 2026Amendment 63, adding text before paragraph 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstS&D
12 Feb 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 16 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireForAgainstS&D
12 Feb 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 14 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireForAgainstS&D
12 Feb 2026Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 13 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireForAgainstS&D
12 Feb 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 12 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAbstainedAgainstS&D
12 Feb 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point f Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenForAgainstS&D
22 Jan 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 29 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAbstainedForS&D
22 Jan 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAbstainedForS&D
22 Jan 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAbstainedForS&D
22 Jan 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAbstainedForS&D
21 Jan 2026Recital O — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025AgainstForS&D
21 Jan 2026Amendment 68 to paragraph 69 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025ForAgainstS&D
21 Jan 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and HerzegovinaAgainstForS&D
20 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital Ea Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAgainstForS&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Thijs REUTEN , S&D · Netherlands 4.2 %2 4027324596

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 2 521 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 81 of 342 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=218347&to=2026-12-31
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Thijs REUTEN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=218347&to=2026-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Thijs REUTEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=218347&to=2026-12-31}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=218347&to=2026-12-31},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}