Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 28 Sept 2026 · Anders VISTISEN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Showing Anders VISTISEN only. Show every member

Anders VISTISEN’s votes against the line, 51

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
26 Mar 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/007 BE/Casa - BelgiumAgainstForPatriots
26 Mar 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/005 AT/KTM - AustriaAgainstForPatriots
26 Mar 2026Amendment 60 to Article 1 — part 4 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)ForAgainstPatriots
26 Mar 2026Amendment 32 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)AgainstForPatriots
26 Mar 2026Amendment 30, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationForAgainstPatriots
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/004 BE/Tupperware – BelgiumAgainstForPatriots
10 Mar 2026Recital J — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAgainstForPatriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 48 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstPatriots
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 6 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedForPatriots
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 47 — part 3 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAgainstForPatriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 45 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedAgainstPatriots
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 41 — part 6 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAgainstForPatriots
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 31 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingForAgainstPatriots
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 29 — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAgainstForPatriots
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 16 — part 5 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedForPatriots
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 16 — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAgainstForPatriots
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAbstainedAgainstPatriots
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 6 — part 6 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAbstainedAgainstPatriots
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 6 — part 1 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAbstainedForPatriots
12 Feb 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAgainstForPatriots
12 Feb 2026Amendment 1 to recital D World Cancer DayForAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 13 — part 4 World Cancer DayAbstainedForPatriots
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsForAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on recital O Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAbstainedAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on recital N Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAbstainedAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAbstainedAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 19 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAbstainedAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAbstainedAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAbstainedAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsForAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsForAgainstPatriots
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretextsAbstainedForPatriots
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in IranAbstainedForPatriots
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi WineAbstainedForPatriots
11 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/006 BE/Audi – BelgiumAgainstForPatriots
10 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Central Bank – annual report 2025AgainstAbstainedPatriots
10 Feb 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsForAgainstPatriots
10 Feb 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAgainstForPatriots
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 4 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaAbstainedAgainstPatriots
22 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Brutal repression against protesters in IranAbstainedForPatriots
22 Jan 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 12 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAgainstAbstainedPatriots
22 Jan 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAgainstForPatriots
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Case of Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African RepublicAbstainedForPatriots
21 Jan 2026Amendment 16 to paragraph 78 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025AgainstForPatriots
21 Jan 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 41 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025ForAbstainedPatriots
21 Jan 2026Final vote on motion B10-0061/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)AgainstForPatriots
21 Jan 2026Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)AgainstForPatriots
20 Jan 2026Separate vote on recital G Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesForAgainstPatriots
20 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertaintiesAgainstAbstainedPatriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 247, adding text after recital 22 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestForAgainstPatriots
Show all 51 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
20 Jan 2026Proposal to reject the text Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestAbstainedAgainstPatriots

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Anders VISTISEN , Patriots · Denmark · left on 13 Apr 2026 8.7 %587272040

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 2 521 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 81 of 342 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 28 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC (data stamp 5a7357168c2a, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 28 Sept 2026 · Anders VISTISEN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=124875&to=2026-12-31 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-28,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 28 Sept 2026 · Anders VISTISEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=124875&to=2026-12-31}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=124875&to=2026-12-31},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}