Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Martin HÄUSLING
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Martin HÄUSLING only. Show every member
Martin HÄUSLING’s votes against the line, 33
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) to paragraph 2 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendments 27 + 89 + 130 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendments 62 + 123 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Proposal to reject the text Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Recital G — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025 | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Recital G — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025 | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Amendment 86, adding text after recital 7 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 10 to paragraph 12 Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy | Against | For | Greens |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 104 to paragraph 58 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Against | For | Greens |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 26, adding text after recital H Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Against | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 5 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 3 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Against | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Against | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Against | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Against | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Against | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Against | For | Greens |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine | Against | For | Greens |
| 10 Jul 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 8 Jul 2025 | Paragraph 28 — part 1 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2024 | Against | For | Greens |
| 21 May 2025 | Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 8 May 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 9 Banking Union – annual report 2024 | Against | For | Greens |
| 8 May 2025 | Final vote The protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus) | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 8 May 2025 | Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) The protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus) | Abstained | For | Greens |
| 7 May 2025 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 55 The European Water Resilience Strategy | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 5 May 2025 | Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Cyprus (resolution) Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Cyprus (resolution) | Abstained | Against | Greens |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 12 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024 | Against | For | Greens |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 88 to paragraph 69 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024 | Against | For | Greens |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 25 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria | Abstained | For | Greens |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin HÄUSLING , Greens · Germany | 1.2 % | 2 721 | 14 | 19 | 0 | 14 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 2 891 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 78 of 371 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=96752&to=2025-12-31
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Martin HÄUSLING”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=96752&to=2025-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Martin HÄUSLING}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=96752&to=2025-12-31}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=96752&to=2025-12-31},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}