Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Matteo RICCI
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Matteo RICCI only. Show every member
Matteo RICCI’s votes against the line, 49
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Dec 2025 | Separate vote on recital H Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania | Against | For | S&D |
| 18 Dec 2025 | Paragraph 11 — part 2 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania | Against | For | S&D |
| 18 Dec 2025 | Paragraph 7 — part 2 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania | Against | For | S&D |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine | For | Against | S&D |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine | For | Against | S&D |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Amendment 7, adding text after recital B Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan | Against | Abstained | S&D |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Recital M — part 2 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement | Against | For | S&D |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore | For | Against | S&D |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Final vote Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process | Against | For | S&D |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Amendment 115 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements | Against | For | S&D |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Amendment 175 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements | For | Against | S&D |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Amendment 363 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements | For | Against | S&D |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 57 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | S&D |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 44, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | S&D |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 391 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | S&D |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 362 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 145 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | S&D |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For | S&D |
| 9 Jul 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 28 2023 and 2024 reports on Albania | Against | For | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2025 | Paragraph 7 — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EU | For | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2025 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 41 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 8 May 2025 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 18 Banking Union – annual report 2024 | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 May 2025 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2024 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 8 May 2025 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital 8 — part 1 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season | For | Against | S&D |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Amendment 16 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Energy-intensive industries | For | Against | S&D |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 6 Energy-intensive industries | For | Against | S&D |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 9 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024 | Against | For | S&D |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 9 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 | For | Against | S&D |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 82, adding text after paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 81, adding text after paragraph 17 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 10 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole White paper on the future of European defence | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 74 White paper on the future of European defence | For | Against | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 68 White paper on the future of European defence | Against | For | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 108 to paragraph 68 White paper on the future of European defence | For | Against | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 15 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defence | Against | For | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 15 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression | Against | For | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 35 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 35 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 26 European Central Bank – annual report 2024 | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 13 European Central Bank – annual report 2024 | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 23 Jan 2025 | Paragraph 14 — part 2 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine | Against | For | S&D |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo RICCI , S&D · Italy | 2.1 % | 2 342 | 35 | 10 | 4 | 34 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 2 891 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 78 of 371 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=257121&to=2025-12-31
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Matteo RICCI”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=257121&to=2025-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Matteo RICCI}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=257121&to=2025-12-31}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=257121&to=2025-12-31},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}