Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Niels GEUKING
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Niels GEUKING only. Show every member
Niels GEUKING’s votes against the line, 33
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Dec 2025 | Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’ | For | Against | EPP |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Amendment 118 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements | For | Against | EPP |
| 23 Oct 2025 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 57 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan | For | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 35 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 81, adding text after paragraph 25 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 22 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 22 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Final vote Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 141 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 139 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Separate vote on Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 137 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 125 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 133 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 132 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Separate vote on Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 25 to paragraph 30 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Amendment 24 to paragraph 25 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 22 May 2025 | Amendment 38 to paragraph 21 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Amendment 2 to paragraph 40 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European Parliament | For | Against | EPP |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Paragraph 92 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024 | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 14 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 13 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 16 — part 2 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights | For | Against | EPP |
| 13 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 28 — part 2 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 25 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 23 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 19 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 13 European Central Bank – annual report 2024 | Abstained | Against | EPP |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niels GEUKING , EPP · Germany | 1.2 % | 2 726 | 16 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 2 891 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 78 of 371 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=251874&to=2025-12-31
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Niels GEUKING”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=251874&to=2025-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Niels GEUKING}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=251874&to=2025-12-31}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=251874&to=2025-12-31},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}