Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Dominik TARCZYŃSKI

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes293All roll calls2 891
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Dominik TARCZYŃSKI only. Show every member

Dominik TARCZYŃSKI’s votes against the line, 60

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
27 Nov 2025Amendment 16, adding text after recital F Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanForAgainstECR
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 63 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024ForAgainstECR
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 60 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024ForAgainstECR
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 26 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024AbstainedAgainstECR
26 Nov 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAgainstForECR
26 Nov 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAgainstAbstainedECR
26 Nov 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialAgainstForECR
26 Nov 2025Paragraph 1, point ag — part 2 EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticForAgainstECR
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)AbstainedForECR
25 Nov 2025Decision to maintain the action Final vote Decision to maintain the action before the Court of Justice for the annulment of the decision of the Commission on the withdrawal of the Standard essential patents proposalForAgainstECR
22 Oct 2025Amendment 147 to paragraph 78 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAgainstForECR
22 Oct 2025Amendment 103, adding text after paragraph 72 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAbstainedAgainstECR
22 Oct 2025Amendment 145, adding text after paragraph 67 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAbstainedForECR
22 Oct 2025Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsForAgainstECR
22 Oct 2025Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAbstainedAgainstECR
22 Oct 2025Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAbstainedAgainstECR
20 Oct 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew GroupAgainstForECR
9 Sept 2025Amendment 396 to Article 2, paragraph 6, partie introductive Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAbstainedForECR
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 56 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumForAgainstECR
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU importsAbstainedForECR
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 33 Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU importsAbstainedForECR
9 Jul 2025Final vote on motion B10-0316/2025 Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add certain countries to the list of high-risk third countries, and to remove other countries from that listForAgainstECR
8 Jul 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 Security of energy supply in the EUAbstainedForECR
8 Jul 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Security of energy supply in the EUAbstainedForECR
8 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 32 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)ForAgainstECR
8 Jul 2025Final vote Bulgaria’s adoption of the euro on 1 January 2026AbstainedForECR
7 May 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 10 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceAbstainedAgainstECR
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 10 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceAbstainedAgainstECR
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsForAgainstECR
5 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — TikTok Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTokAbstainedForECR
3 Apr 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 39 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAbstainedForECR
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 4, indent 7 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 27 to paragraph 4, after indent 6 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024AbstainedForECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 33 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAgainstForECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 32 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAgainstForECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAbstainedAgainstECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAbstainedAgainstECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAbstainedForECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAbstainedAgainstECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 14 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAbstainedAgainstECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIForAgainstECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 10 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAbstainedAgainstECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 7 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIForAgainstECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAbstainedForECR
2 Apr 2025Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIForAgainstECR
1 Apr 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the USAAbstainedForECR
1 Apr 2025Final vote Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAgainstForECR
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 16 — part 4 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsForAgainstECR
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 5 — part 6 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsForAgainstECR
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 5 — part 4 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsForAgainstECR
Show all 60 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 5 — part 2 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsForAgainstECR
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 5 — part 1 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsForAgainstECR
12 Mar 2025Amendment 101 to paragraph 39 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstForECR
12 Mar 2025Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 32 White paper on the future of European defenceAbstainedForECR
12 Mar 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 1 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainstECR
12 Mar 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 18 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionForAgainstECR
12 Mar 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 18 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionForAgainstECR
12 Mar 2025Separate vote on paragraph 4 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAgainstForECR
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework ProgrammeAbstainedForECR
13 Feb 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 Recent dismissals and arrests of mayors in TürkiyeAbstainedForECR

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI , ECR · Poland 4.0 %1 5173128144

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 2 891 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 78 of 371 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=204346&to=2025-12-31
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Dominik TARCZYŃSKI”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=204346&to=2025-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Dominik TARCZYŃSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=204346&to=2025-12-31}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=204346&to=2025-12-31},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}