Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Jens GIESEKE
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Jens GIESEKE only. Show every member
Jens GIESEKE’s votes against the line, 54
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Dec 2025 | Separate vote on recital R European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’ | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan | Against | For | EPP |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 77 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | Against | For | EPP |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 60 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 60 — part 1 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 18 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 27 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 17 — part 3 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 | Against | For | EPP |
| 25 Nov 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole 2024 budget: assessing the implementation of the gender mainstreaming methodology in the EU budget | Against | For | EPP |
| 25 Nov 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | Against | For | EPP |
| 25 Nov 2025 | Decision to maintain the action Final vote Decision to maintain the action before the Court of Justice for the annulment of the decision of the Commission on the withdrawal of the Standard essential patents proposal | For | Against | EPP |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Recital M — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025 | Against | For | EPP |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 79 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025 | Against | For | EPP |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 72 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025 | Against | For | EPP |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Amendment 48 to recital 9 Framework for achieving climate neutrality | For | Against | EPP |
| 23 Oct 2025 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 57 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan | For | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 48 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 35 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 118, adding text after paragraph 35 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 116, adding text after paragraph 30 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | EPP |
| 9 Oct 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Second World Summit for Social Development | Against | For | EPP |
| 9 Oct 2025 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Final vote Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | Against | For | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 141 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 139 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Separate vote on Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | Against | For | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 137 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 125 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 124 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 133 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Amendment 132 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | For | Against | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Separate vote on Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain | Against | For | EPP |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis | Against | For | EPP |
| 10 Jul 2025 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital S Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | For | Against | EPP |
| 9 Jul 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 9 Jul 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 48 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 9 Jul 2025 | Paragraph 37 — part 3 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2025 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 61 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report | For | Against | EPP |
| 18 Jun 2025 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 57 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2025 | Amendment 186 to Article 3, after paragraph 2 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) | Against | For | EPP |
| 22 May 2025 | Amendment 23 to paragraph 10 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 | For | Against | EPP |
| 22 May 2025 | Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 | Against | Abstained | EPP |
| 8 May 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 9 Banking Union – annual report 2024 | Against | For | EPP |
| 7 May 2025 | Paragraph 40 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service | Against | For | EPP |
| 7 May 2025 | Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 131 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds | For | Against | EPP |
| 5 May 2025 | Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — TikTok Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – TikTok | Against | For | EPP |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 6 Energy-intensive industries | For | Against | EPP |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus - threats from the Investigative Committee | Against | For | EPP |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Paragraph 92 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024 | Against | For | EPP |
| 13 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 White paper on the future of European defence | For | Against | EPP |
Show all 54 votes
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 31 — part 6 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 | Against | For | EPP |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 | Against | For | EPP |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 | For | Against | EPP |
| 13 Feb 2025 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 Continuing detention and risk of the death penalty for individuals in Nigeria charged with blasphemy, notably the case of Yahaya Sharif-Aminu | Against | For | EPP |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jens GIESEKE , EPP · Germany | 2.1 % | 2 620 | 44 | 9 | 1 | 20 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 2 891 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 78 of 371 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=124807&to=2025-12-31
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Jens GIESEKE”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=124807&to=2025-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Jens GIESEKE}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=124807&to=2025-12-31}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=124807&to=2025-12-31},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}