Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 16 Jul 2024 – 31 Dec 2024 · Pär HOLMGREN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Showing Pär HOLMGREN only. Show every member

Pär HOLMGREN’s votes against the line, 20

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point q — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAgainstForGreens
18 Dec 2024Amendment 9 to recital D Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeForAbstainedGreens
18 Dec 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 4, point 2, paragraph 4 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesForAgainstGreens
18 Dec 2024Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAbstainedAgainstGreens
18 Dec 2024Amendment 1 to paragraph 2 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAbstainedAgainstGreens
14 Nov 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAbstainedAgainstGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 1 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 54 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAgainstForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 50 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 34 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 15 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 15 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 15 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 15 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 5 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 6, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForGreens
23 Oct 2024Amendment 733 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sectionsAgainstAbstainedGreens
19 Sept 2024Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Situation in VenezuelaForAgainstGreens
19 Sept 2024Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAbstainedForGreens
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAgainstForGreens

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Pär HOLMGREN , Greens · Sweden 4.0 %498513219

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 516 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 15 of 81 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 16 Jul 2024 – 31 Dec 2024 · Pär HOLMGREN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2024-01-01&mep=197398&to=2024-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 16 Jul 2024 – 31 Dec 2024 · Pär HOLMGREN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2024-01-01&mep=197398&to=2024-12-31}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2024-01-01&mep=197398&to=2024-12-31},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}