Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Finland

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 752

Order Highest rate first By name

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

By member, 15

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN , ECR · Finland Their votes against the line	18.7 %	1 251	138	50	46	0
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN , EPP · Finland Their votes against the line	12.0 %	1 475	158	15	4	16
Merja KYLLÖNEN , The Left · Finland Their votes against the line	7.2 %	1 628	56	32	29	80
Jussi SARAMO , The Left · Finland Their votes against the line	6.3 %	1 620	30	45	27	97
Li ANDERSSON , The Left · Finland Their votes against the line	6.1 %	1 503	29	37	26	88
Katri KULMUNI , Renew · Finland Their votes against the line	4.3 %	1 340	49	8	0	21
Aura SALLA , EPP · Finland Their votes against the line	3.5 %	1 376	36	12	0	21
Eero HEINÄLUOMA , S&D · Finland Their votes against the line	3.5 %	1 589	25	30	0	31
Maria GUZENINA , S&D · Finland Their votes against the line	3.2 %	1 699	24	28	2	31
Mika AALTOLA , EPP · Finland Their votes against the line	2.3 %	1 209	26	1	1	19
Elsi KATAINEN , Renew · Finland Their votes against the line	1.9 %	1 694	29	3	0	21
Pekka TOVERI , EPP · Finland Their votes against the line	1.4 %	1 515	20	1	0	17
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON , Renew · Finland Their votes against the line	1.2 %	1 453	9	8	0	0
Ville NIINISTÖ , Greens · Finland Their votes against the line	0.1 %	957	1	0	0	0
Maria OHISALO , Greens · Finland Their votes against the line	0.1 %	1 709	1	0	0	0

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 752 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?country=FI&from=2026-03-26&to=2026-09-26
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Finland”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?country=FI&from=2026-03-26&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Finland}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?country=FI&from=2026-03-26&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?country=FI&from=2026-03-26&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}