Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Cohesion

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · topic Corruption & integrity (model-assigned) · national delegations · per quarter · abstentions counted

How united do the delegations vote — over time, and on the votes of each committee or topic?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes4All roll calls63
Blocs GroupsDelegations
Periods Part-sessionsQuartersMonthsWhole period
Positions For, against, abstainedFor and against only ⓘ

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index per quarter, from 0 (evenly split) to 1 (all voted the same). A vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; a gap is a period with fewer than 20 votes counted.

Cohesion of the delegations per quarter, Q2 2025 to Q2 2026: Agreement Index from 0 (evenly split) to 1 (all voted the same).

Q2 2025 → Q2 2026; each panel highlights one series, the others faint behind it.

Data as a table
Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
PeriodAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCyprusCzechiaGermanyDenmarkEstoniaSpainFinlandFranceGreeceCroatiaHungaryIrelandItalyLithuaniaLuxembourgLatviaMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSwedenSloveniaSlovakia
Q2 2025—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—0 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—0 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—0 votes—0 votes—0 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—6 votes—0 votes—6 votes
Q1 2026—2 votes—2 votes—2 votes—0 votes—2 votes—2 votes—2 votes—0 votes—2 votes—2 votes—2 votes—2 votes—1 vote—2 votes—0 votes—2 votes—2 votes—0 votes—0 votes—0 votes—2 votes—2 votes—2 votes—2 votes—2 votes—0 votes—2 votes
Q2 20260.4855 votes0.6555 votes0.5355 votes—0 votes0.5155 votes0.6155 votes0.7955 votes—0 votes0.7155 votes0.9054 votes0.4755 votes0.5555 votes—15 votes0.5955 votes0.8555 votes0.4655 votes0.6352 votes—0 votes—0 votes—0 votes0.5655 votes0.4455 votes0.7255 votes0.5755 votes0.7955 votes—0 votes0.3850 votes
Whole period0.490.650.53—0.510.610.78—0.720.900.460.570.830.610.870.460.64———0.570.430.740.590.79—0.38
Votes considered636363063636306362636322636163600006363636363058

Over the whole selection

Each delegation’s Agreement Index over every vote in the selection where enough of its members voted.

Cohesion: the Agreement Index (0–1) over the votes counted — votes where at least 10 members and a third of the seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes. Seats: members now. Order as the backend lists the blocs, not a ranking.
DelegationCohesionVotes countedSeats
Austria 0.496320
Belgium 0.656322
Bulgaria 0.536317
Cyprus fewer than 10 seats — not compared—06
Czechia 0.516321
Germany 0.616395
Denmark 0.786315
Estonia fewer than 10 seats — not compared—07
Spain 0.726360
Finland 0.906215
France 0.466381
Greece 0.576321
Croatia 0.832212
Hungary 0.616321
Ireland 0.876114
Italy 0.466376
Lithuania 0.646011
Luxembourg fewer than 10 seats — not compared—06
Latvia fewer than 10 seats — not compared—09
Malta fewer than 10 seats — not compared—06
Netherlands 0.576331
Poland 0.436353
Portugal 0.746321
Romania 0.596333
Sweden 0.796321
Slovenia fewer than 10 seats — not compared—09
Slovakia 0.385815

The tables by committee and by topic are computed over a whole period: choose Whole period.

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 63 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 8 of 12 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • 430 times a bloc had too few members voting on a vote (fewer than 10, or under a third of its seats) and was left out of that vote (turnout rule).
  • Cohesion is the Agreement Index: 1 when every voting member took the same position, 0 when the bloc split evenly three ways (method). A bloc counts on a vote only when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; the non-attached have no group cohesion.
  • A delegation’s cohesion reflects the mix of groups its members sit in. Delegations with fewer than 10 seats are shown but not compared.
  • Months are offered for all roll calls only, and a month needs at least 20 votes.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Cohesion (Agreement Index) v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/cohesion?by=country&scope=all&topic=justice%2Fcorruption&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Cohesion — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · topic Corruption & integrity (model-assigned) · national delegations · per quarter · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/cohesion?by=country&scope=all&topic=justice%2Fcorruption&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Cohesion — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · topic Corruption \& integrity (model-assigned) · national delegations · per quarter · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/cohesion?by=country&scope=all&topic=justice%2Fcorruption&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/cohesion?by=country&scope=all&topic=justice%2Fcorruption&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}