Skip to content

Analysis

Cohesion

Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · topic EU security & defence policy (model-assigned) · national delegations · whole period · abstentions counted

How united do the delegations vote — over time, and on the votes of each committee or topic?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Over the whole selection

Each delegation’s Agreement Index over every vote in the selection where enough of its members voted.

Cohesion: the Agreement Index (0–1) over the votes counted — votes where at least 10 members and a third of the seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes. Seats: members now. Order as the backend lists the blocs, not a ranking.
DelegationCohesionVotes countedSeats
Austria —1720
Belgium —1722
Bulgaria —1717
Cyprus fewer than 10 seats — not compared—06
Czechia —1721
Germany —1795
Denmark —1715
Estonia fewer than 10 seats — not compared—07
Spain —1760
Finland —1715
France —1781
Greece —1721
Croatia —1512
Hungary —1521
Ireland —1314
Italy —1776
Lithuania —1511
Luxembourg fewer than 10 seats — not compared—06
Latvia fewer than 10 seats — not compared—09
Malta fewer than 10 seats — not compared—06
Netherlands —1731
Poland —1753
Portugal —1721
Romania —1733
Sweden —1721
Slovenia fewer than 10 seats — not compared—09
Slovakia —1715

By lead committee

Cohesion on the votes of each lead committee’s dossiers, 17 votes in all. A figure needs at least 20 votes where enough of the bloc’s members voted.

Every lead committee has fewer than 20 votes in this selection — too few for a cohesion figure; the counts are below. Widen the period or drop a filter.

Lead committee of the dossier. Votes: the votes in the selection under it. Each delegation’s column: its Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
CommitteeVotesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCyprusCzechiaGermanyDenmarkEstoniaSpainFinlandFranceGreeceCroatiaHungaryIrelandItalyLithuaniaLuxembourgLatviaMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSwedenSloveniaSlovakia
Security and Defence (SEDE)7———————————————————————————
Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO)2———————————————————————————
Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE)2———————————————————————————
Foreign Affairs (AFET)1———————————————————————————
Environment, Climate and Food Safety (ENVI)1———————————————————————————

By topic

Cohesion on the votes of each topic. A figure needs at least 20 votes where enough of the bloc’s members voted. Topics are assigned by a language model, not checked by hand.

Every topic has fewer than 20 votes in this selection — too few for a cohesion figure; the counts are below. Widen the period or drop a filter.

Topic (model-assigned). Votes: the votes in the selection under it. Each delegation’s column: its Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
TopicVotesAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCyprusCzechiaGermanyDenmarkEstoniaSpainFinlandFranceGreeceCroatiaHungaryIrelandItalyLithuaniaLuxembourgLatviaMaltaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSwedenSloveniaSlovakia
Defence & security17———————————————————————————
Foreign affairs10———————————————————————————
Economy & single market6———————————————————————————
EU budget & funds1———————————————————————————
Health1———————————————————————————
EU institutions & Parliament1———————————————————————————
Transport & tourism1———————————————————————————

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 17 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 1 of 18 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • 112 times a bloc had too few members voting on a vote (fewer than 10, or under a third of its seats) and was left out of that vote (turnout rule).
  • Cohesion is the Agreement Index: 1 when every voting member took the same position, 0 when the bloc split evenly three ways (method). A bloc counts on a vote only when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; the non-attached have no group cohesion.
  • A delegation’s cohesion reflects the mix of groups its members sit in. Delegations with fewer than 10 seats are shown but not compared.
  • Months are offered for all roll calls only, and a month needs at least 20 votes.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Cohesion (Agreement Index) v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Cohesion — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · topic EU security & defence policy (model-assigned) · national delegations · whole period · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/cohesion?bucket=term&by=country&topic=defence%2Fpolicy&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Cohesion — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · topic EU security \& defence policy (model-assigned) · national delegations · whole period · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/cohesion?bucket=term&by=country&topic=defence%2Fpolicy&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/cohesion?bucket=term&by=country&topic=defence%2Fpolicy&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}